Frequency of positive antiphospholipid antibodies in pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection and impact on pregnancy outcome: A single-center prospective study on 151 pregnancies.

Background: At the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, there was a lack of information about the infection's impact on pregnancy and capability to induce de novo autoantibodies. It soon became clear that thrombosis was a manifestation of COVID-19, therefore the possible contribution of de novo antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) raised research interest. We aimed at screening SARS-CoV-2 positive pregnant patients for aPL. Methods: The study included consecutive pregnant women who were hospitalized in our Obstetric Department between March 2020 and July 2021 for either a symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection or for other reasons (obstetric complications, labour, delivery) and found positive at the admission nasopharyngeal swab. All these women underwent the search for aPL by means of Lupus Anticoagulant (LA), IgG/IgM anti-cardiolipin (aCL), IgG/IgM anti-beta2glycoprotein I (aB2GPI). Data about comorbidities, obstetric and neonatal complications were collected. Results: 151 women were included. Sixteen (11%) were positive for aPL, mostly at low titre. Pneumonia was diagnosed in 20 women (5 with positive aPL) and 5 required ICU admission (2 with positive aPL). Obstetric complications occurred in 10/16 (63%) aPL positive and in 36/135 (27%) negative patients. The occurrence of HELLP syndrome and preeclampsia was significantly associated with positive aPL (p=0,004). One case of maternal thrombosis occurred in an aPL negative woman. aPL positivity was checked after at least 12 weeks in 7/16 women (44%): 3 had become negative; 2 were still positive (1 IgG aB2GPI + IgG aCL; 1 IgM aB2GPI); 1 remained positive for IgG aCL but became negative for aB2GPI; 1 became negative for LA but displayed a new positivity for IgG aCL at high titre. Conclusions: The frequency of positive aPL in pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection was low in our cohort and similar to the one described in the general obstetric population. aPL mostly presented as single positive, low titre, transient antibodies. The rate of obstetric complications was higher in aPL positive women as compared to negative ones, particularly hypertensive disorders. Causality cannot be excluded; however, other risk factors, including a full-blown picture of COVID-19, may have elicited the pathogenic potential of aPL and contributed themselves to the development of complications.

Lupus anticoagulants as a prospective independent predictor in COVID-19 patients.

OBJECTIVE: Lupus anticoagulant (LA) are commonly detected during SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, the relationship between LA and clinical significance is still unclear. METHODS: A retrospective chart analysis was performed on COVID-19 patients who were tested for LA at our hospital from March 2020 to November 2021. We analyzed the patient's characteristics based on the result of the LA test. In addition, subgroup analysis performed the LA-positive group who had undergone serial LA tests. RESULTS: A total of 219 COVID-19 patients were enrolled in the study, 148 patients (67.6%) were positive for LA test. The LA-positive group received more treatment of high flow nasal cannula (LA-positive 73.0%, LA-negative 57.7%, p = 0.024). The LA-positive group showed prolonged aPTT, higher levels of CRP and fibrinogen (all p's < 0.05). Among 148 LA-positive patients, 127 patients (86.5%) were found to be LA-positive within 10 days of SARS-CoV-2 positive, and LA-positive group confirmed a median time to LA loss of 10 days. However, there was a group that was negative for LA in the early stages of infection and became positive about 13 days later. A subgroup analysis showed that these patients had different characteristics due to their longer hospital stays and higher D-dimer levels. CONCLUSIONS: In COVID-19 patients, LA is expected to be associated to disease severity. Since the clinical significance of LA is different depending on the onset time of LA positivity, the LA test is suggested to be done at diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, even if LA is negative, follow-up test should be considered within 10 days.

COVID-19 and antiphospholipid antibodies.

Antiphospholipid syndrome and the coagulopathy of COVID-19 share many pathophysiologic features, including endotheliopathy, hypercoagulability, and activation of platelets, complement pathways, and neutrophil extracellular traps, all acting in concert via a model of immunothrombosis. Antiphospholipid antibody production in COVID-19 is common, with 50% of COVID-19 patients being positive for lupus anticoagulant in some studies, and with non-Sapporo criteria antiphospholipid antibodies being prevalent as well. The biological significance of antiphospholipid antibodies in COVID-19 is uncertain, as such antibodies are usually transient, and studies examining clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients with and without antiphospholipid antibodies have yielded conflicting results. In this review, we explore the biology of antiphospholipid antibodies in COVID-19 and other infections and discuss mechanisms of thrombogenesis in antiphospholipid syndrome and parallels with COVID-19 coagulopathy. In addition, we review the existing literature on safety of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies and antiphospholipid syndrome.

Lupus anticoagulant-hypoprothrombinemia syndrome with severe bleeding diathesis after coronavirus disease 2019: a case report.

Acquired antibodies against factor II (prothrombin) are rare and most commonly associated with severe liver disease or vitamin K antagonist treatment. In very rare cases, these antibodies and associated hypoprothrombinemia are found in patients with lupus anticoagulant (LAC), an antiphospholipid antibody that inhibits phospholipid-dependent coagulation tests. This uncommon entity, called lupus anticoagulant-hypoprothrombinemia syndrome (LAHPS), may cause both severe, life-threatening bleeding and a predisposition to thrombosis. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with a variety of coagulation abnormalities and an increased risk of thrombosis. Bleeding may occur, but it is less common than thromboembolism and has mostly been described in association with the severity of the disease and anticoagulation treatment in hospitalized patients, rarely in the post-acute phase of the disease. We report on a case of an 80-year-old man who developed LAHPS with prothrombin antibodies and severe bleeding after COVID-19.

Association of Lupus Anticoagulant status with Disease Course in SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection.

Background: We investigated the importance of lupus anticoagulant (LA) in patients with SARS-CoV-2. Methods: Medical records of 41 SARS-CoV-2 infected patients were reviewed. Patients were classified into two groups according to the frequency of positive LA test results: "LA (-)" and "LA (+) ≥1" (LA positive at least once). Statistical analysis was performed to determine the association between LA presence and change in LA test results and disease course according to both hospital days (HD) and days after diagnosis (DD). Results: The prevalence of LA was 51.2%. Averagely, the first change in LA test result occurred during DD 12-13 and between HD 9-10. The second change occurred on DD 15-16 and HD 13-14. The presence of LA was associated with severe disease (P = .004) but was not associated with thrombotic complications or mortality. The change of results from negative to positive or vice versa or the frequency of the changes was not associated with disease severity, thrombotic complications, or mortality. Conclusions: LA positivity can be regarded as one of the findings suggesting more serious SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Pathophysiology of Antiphospholipid Syndrome.

The antiphospholipid syndrome is characterized by antibodies directed against phospholipid-binding proteins and phospholipids attached to cell membrane receptors, mitochondria, oxidized lipoproteins, and activated complement components. When antibodies bind to these complex antigens, cells are activated and the coagulation and complement cascades are triggered, culminating in thrombotic events and pregnancy morbidity that further define the syndrome. The phospholipid-binding proteins most often involved are annexins II and V, ß2-glycoprotein I, prothrombin, and cardiolipin. A distinguishing feature of the antiphospholipid syndrome is the "lupus anticoagulant." This is not a single entity but rather a family of antibodies directed against complex antigens consisting of ß2-glycoprotein I and/or prothrombin bound to an anionic phospholipid. Although these antibodies prolong in vitro clotting times by competing with clotting factors for phospholipid binding sites, they are not associated with clinical bleeding. Rather, they are thrombogenic because they augment thrombin production in vivo by concentrating prothrombin on phospholipid surfaces. Other antiphospholipid antibodies decrease the clot-inhibitory properties of the endothelium and enhance platelet adherence and aggregation. Some are atherogenic because they increase lipid peroxidation by reducing paraoxonase activity, and others impair fetal nutrition by diminishing placental antithrombotic and fibrinolytic activity. This plethora of destructive autoantibodies is currently managed with immunomodulatory agents, but new approaches to treatment might include vaccines against specific autoantigens, blocking the antibodies generated by exposure to cytoplasmic DNA, and selective targeting of aberrant B-cells to reduce or eliminate autoantibody production.

Antiphospholipid antibodies: what is new in 2022 / Détection des anticorps antiphospholipides : actualités en 2022

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a clinicobiological entity defined by the association of thrombotic events and/or obstetric complications and the presence of persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) detected by coagulation tests (lupus anticoagulant, LAC) and/or immunological assays (anticardiolipin and anti-glycoprotein-beta-I antibodies). The increased use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is now a challenge for hematology laboratories for the diagnosis of APS. DOAC interfere with LAC screening and confirmation tests resulting in a risk of false positive results. To avoid these interferences, several solutions are suggested. Some of them rely on the use of DOAC-reversal systems (activated charcoal tablet, filter system) others on the use of reagents insensitive to DOAC presence in the sample. Detection of anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies may be helpful because they are strongly associated to the presence of LAC and are increasingly recognized as a useful tool in the diagnosis and prognosis of APS. Finally, positivity of LA in the setting of a viral infection is frequent and not specific to APS. During the Covid-19 pandemic, many patients developed arterial and VTE that could suggest testing for aPLs. The association between LAC and a risk of VTE or in-hospital mortality in hospitalized Covid-19 patients was not demonstrated. Moreover, aPLs do not persist after Covid-19. Currently, testing for aPLs in Covid-19 patients is not recommended.

Le syndrome des antiphospholipides (SAPL) est une entité clinico-biologique définie par l'association de manifestations thrombotiques et/ou de complications obstétricales et la présence persistante d'anticorps antiphospholipides (aPLs) détectés par des tests de coagulation (lupus anticoagulant, LA) et/ou par des tests immunologiques (anticorps anti-cardiolipine et anticorps anti-ß2-glycoprotéine-I). L'essor des anticoagulants oraux directs (AOD) dans la prise en charge des évènements thrombotiques veineux (ETV) constitue aujourd'hui un défi pour les laboratoires d'hémostase dans le cadre du diagnostic du SAPL. Les AOD interfèrent avec les tests de dépistage et de confirmation du LA occasionnant des faux positifs. Afin de se soustraire à ces interférences plusieurs solutions sont proposées. Certaines reposent sur l'utilisation de système neutralisant l'AOD (pastille de charbon activé, système de filtre) d'autres sur l'utilisation de réactifs insensibles à la présence d'AOD. On peut également faire appel aux anticorps anti-phosphatidylsérine/prothrombine très corrélés à la présence de LA et constituant un outil de plus en plus reconnu dans le diagnostic biologique du SAPL et son pronostic. Enfin, la positivité des aPLs dans un contexte infectieux est fréquente et non spécifique du SAPL. Au cours de la pandémie Covid-19, de nombreux patients ont présentés des ETV et artériels qui ont pu motiver la recherche d'aPLs. L'association entre LA et le risque d'ETV ou la mortalité hospitalière chez les patients Covid-19 hospitalisés n'a pas été démontrée. De plus, il ne semble pas qu'il y ait de persistance de ces aPLs après la Covid-19. A ce jour, la recherche d'aPLs chez les patients atteint de Covid-19 n'est pas recommandée.

Real-life experience of edoxaban treatment for venous thromboembolism (VTE)/pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients with isolated positive Lupus Anticoagulant (LAC) during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown in Italy.

OBJECTIVE: Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have established indications, according to recent guidelines for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE), including pulmonary embolism (PE), with a safer profile compared to vitamin K antagonist (VKA) in terms of a lower risk for major bleeding and no need of blood coagulation tests. However, DOACs are not indicated in the treatment of patients with triple-positive antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). This limitation is often extended in clinical practice to patients with isolated positivity. The COVID-19 pandemic has sometimes made it difficult to maintain a safe VKA treatment, due to the practical difficulties of performing INR. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated 39 patients with a previous unprovoked VTE/PE, who were no longer eligible for VKA treatment due to the difficulty of performing INR during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown, in Italy. All patients had a positive LAC and refused a long-term anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin. They were shifted to edoxaban. RESULTS: Any recurrence of VTE/PE occurred during the observation period (up to eight months of treatment), while only one minor bleeding event was recorded (Hazard ratio=0.06, 95% confidence interval 0.03-0.11, p=0.094). No arterial events occurred during the observation period. Hemoglobin, platelets, and creatinine were unchanged during the observation period. CONCLUSIONS: Edoxaban treatment may be safe and effective in preventing the recurrence of VTE/PE in patients with isolated LAC positivity, without the occurrence of arterial events.

Abnormal immunothrombosis and lupus anticoagulant in a catastrophic COVID-19 recalling Asherson's syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a complex disease with many clinicopathological aspects, including abnormal immunothrombosis, and the full comprehension of its pathogenetic mechanisms is urgently required. METHODS/RESULTS: By means of a multidisciplinary approach, we here report a catastrophic COVID-19 in a 44-year-old Philippine male patient, discovered lupus anticoagulant (LAC)-positive shortly before death, occurred 8 days after hospitalization in a clinical scenario refractory to standard high acuity care recalling Asherson's syndrome (catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome). CONCLUSION: A parallelism between this severe form of COVID-19 and Asherson's syndrome can be so drawn. Both the diseases in fact exhibit hypercytokinemia, thrombotic microangiopathy, disseminated intravascular coagulation and multiple organ failure, they show a relationship with viral infections, and they are burdened by a high mortality rate. A genetic predisposition to develop these two overlapping conditions may be supposed.

Lupus anticoagulant is an independent risk factor for non-thrombotic in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients.

BACKGROUND: Thromboembolic disease is a frequent cause of death during SARS CoV-2 infection. Lupus anticoagulant (LA) appears frequently during the acute phase of infection. It is not clear whether it is merely an epiphenomenon or whether it is related to the patients' outcome. METHODS: Prospective observational cohort of 211 patients (118 women, mean age 65 years, range: 18 to 99) hospitalized for COVID-19. All patients were tested for LA at admission and retested six months after discharge. RESULTS: The LA test was positive in 128 patients (60.7%). The survival probability at 31 days was clearly worse in the LA-positive group (60%) than in the LA-negative group (90%) (P = 0.023). This notable difference in survival was confirmed by multivariate analysis (HR 3.9, 95% CI 1.04-14.5, P = 0.04). However, it was not explained by differences in thrombotic events (three in either group, P = 0.6). LA-positive patients had higher ferritin, CRP and IL-6 levels, and lower PAFI ratio and lymphocyte and platelet counts. Six months after discharge, LA was negative in the vast majority of positive cases (94%). CONCLUSION: LA is an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients. It is associated with inflammation and disease severity but not with thromboembolic events. This marker usually disappears at six months.

Lupus Anticoagulant Single Positivity During the Acute Phase of COVID-19 Is Not Associated With Venous Thromboembolism or In-Hospital Mortality.

OBJECTIVE: The clinical relevance of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) in COVID-19 is controversial. This study was undertaken to investigate the prevalence and prognostic value of conventional and nonconventional aPLs in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective observational study in a French cohort of patients hospitalized with suspected COVID-19. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-nine patients were hospitalized with suspected COVID-19, in whom COVID-19 was confirmed in 154 and not confirmed in 95. We found a significant increase in lupus anticoagulant (LAC) positivity among patients with COVID-19 compared to patients without COVID-19 (60.9% versus 23.7%; P < 0.001), while prevalence of conventional aPLs (IgG and IgM anti-ß2 -glycoprotein I and IgG and IgM anticardiolipin isotypes) and nonconventional aPLs (IgA isotype of anticardiolipin, IgA isotype of anti-ß2 -glycoprotein I, IgG and IgM isotypes of anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin, and IgG and IgM isotypes of antiprothrombin) was low in both groups. Patients with COVID-19 who were positive for LAC, as compared to patients with COVID-19 who were negative for LAC, had higher levels of fibrinogen (median 6.0 gm/liter [interquartile range 5.0-7.0] versus 5.3 gm/liter [interquartile range 4.3-6.4]; P = 0.028) and C-reactive protein (CRP) (median 115.5 mg/liter [interquartile range 66.0-204.8] versus 91.8 mg/liter [interquartile range 27.0-155.1]; P = 0.019). Univariate analysis did not show any association between LAC positivity and higher risks of venous thromboembolism (VTE) (odds ratio 1.02 [95% confidence interval 0.44-2.43], P = 0.95) or in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.80 [95% confidence interval 0.70-5.05], P = 0.24). With and without adjustment for CRP level, age, and sex, Kaplan-Meier survival curves according to LAC positivity confirmed the absence of an association with VTE or in-hospital mortality (unadjusted P = 0.64 and P = 0.26, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio 1.13 [95% confidence interval 0.48-2.60] and 1.80 [95% confidence interval 0.67-5.01], respectively). CONCLUSION: Patients with COVID-19 have an increased prevalence of LAC positivity associated with biologic markers of inflammation. However, LAC positivity at the time of hospital admission is not associated with VTE risk and/or in-hospital mortality.

Coronavirus-disease-2019-induced antiphospholipid-like syndrome: a case report.

BACKGROUND: This paper describes a case of antiphospholipid syndrome-like condition caused by coronavirus disease 2019. The medical community still faces many diagnostic and therapeutic challenges vis-à-vis coronavirus disease 2019. Ultimately, coronavirus disease 2019 is diagnosed on the basis of laboratory and radiological findings. Considering the high rate of mortality due to coagulation abnormalities and thrombosis among coronavirus disease 2019 patients, it is important to pay attention to the differential diagnoses of coronavirus disease 2019 and other diseases following thrombotic events. CASE DESCRIPTION: The patient was a 56-year-old Iranian man who underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery and mitral valve repair. During hospitalization, the patient showed an elevated level of anticardiolipin antibody (immunoglobulin G isotype), antiphospholipid antibodies, and thrombosis in the brachial artery of the left hand, based on which a differential diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome was made. However, ultimately, the coronavirus disease 2019 polymerase chain reaction test and computed tomography scan of the lungs showed that the patient had coronavirus disease 2019. CONCLUSION: According to the few studies performed on coronavirus disease 2019 patients, elevated levels of the isotypes of antiphospholipid antibodies in coronavirus disease 2019 patients create conditions similar to antiphospholipid syndrome, which, in the absence of reliable coronavirus disease 2019 testing, can lead to misdiagnosis and consequently delayed or improper treatment. Therefore, to provide timely and appropriate treatment, it is important to pay attention to differential diagnosis.

The Role of Antiphospholipid Antibodies in COVID-19.

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Elevated levels of anti-phospholipid (aPL) antibodies are the most important criterion in the diagnosis of anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS) and are usually responsible for promoting the risk of thrombotic complications. Now, in the course of the global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, measurable aPL antibodies have also been detected in a noticeable number of patients showing a variety ranging from studies with only isolated positive tests to cohorts with very high positivity. Thus, the question arises as to whether these two different clinical pictures may be linked. RECENT FINDINGS: The ambivalent results showed a frequent occurrence of the investigated aPL antibodies in COVID-19 patients to an individually varying degree. While some question a substantial correlation according to their results, a number of studies raise questions about the significance of a correlation of aPL antibodies in COVID-19 patients. Within the scope of this review, these have now been described and compared with each other. Ultimately, it is necessary to conduct further studies that specifically test aPL antibodies in a larger context in order to make subsequent important statements about the role of APS in COVID-19 and to further strengthen the significance of the described comparisons.

Systematic Review of Antiphospholipid Antibodies in COVID-19 Patients: Culprits or Bystanders?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: COVID-19 patients have a procoagulant state with a high prevalence of thrombotic events. The hypothesis of an involvement of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) has been suggested by several reports. Here, we reviewed 48 studies investigating aPL in COVID-19 patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Prevalence of Lupus Anticoagulant (LA) ranged from 35% to 92% in ICU patients. Anti-cardiolipin (aCL) IgG and IgM were found in up to 52% and up to 40% of patients respectively. Anti-ß2-glycoprotein I (aß2-GPI) IgG and IgM were found in up to 39% and up to 34% of patients respectively. Between 1% and 12% of patients had a triple positive aPL profile. There was a high prevalence of aß2-GPI and aCL IgA isotype. Two cohort studies found few persistent LA but more persistent solid phase assay aPL over time. aPL determination and their potential role is a real challenge for the treatment of this disease.

Is Lupus Anticoagulant a Significant Feature of COVID-19? A Critical Appraisal of the Literature.

The term "lupus anticoagulant (LA)" identifies a form of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) causing prolongation of clotting tests in a phospholipid concentration-dependent manner. LA is one of the laboratory criteria identified in patients with antiphospholipid (antibody) syndrome (APS). The presence of LA in patients with APS represents a significant risk factor for both thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity. There have been several reports of similarities between some of the pathophysiological features of COVID-19 and APS, in particular the most severe form, catastrophic APS. There have also been many reports identifying various aPLs, including LA, in COVID-19 patients. Accordingly, a very pertinent question arises: "Is LA a feature of COVID-19 pathology?" In this review, we critically appraise the literature to help answer this question. We conclude that LA positivity is a feature of COVID-19, at least in some patients, and potentially those who are the sickest or have the most severe infection. However, many publications have failed to appropriately consider the many confounders to LA identification, being assessed using clot-based assays such as the dilute Russell viper venom time, the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and the silica clotting time. First, most patients hospitalized with COVID-19 are placed on anticoagulant therapy, and those with prior histories of thrombosis would possibly present to hospital already on anticoagulant therapy. All anticoagulants, including vitamin K antagonists, heparin (both unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin), and direct oral anticoagulants affect these clot-based assays. Second, C-reactive protein (CRP) is highly elevated in COVID-19 patients, and also associated with severity. CRP can also lead to false-positive LA, particularly with the aPTT assay. Third, persistence of aPL positivity (including LA) is required to identify APS. Fourth, those at greatest risk of thrombosis due to aPL are those with highest titers or multiple positivity. Most publications either did not identify anticoagulation and/or CRP in their COVID-19 cohorts or did not seem to account for these as possible confounders for LA detection. Most publications did not assess for aPL persistence, and where persistence was checked, LA appeared to represent transient aPL. Finally, high titer aPL or multiple aPL positivity were in the minority of COVID-19 presentations. Thus, at least some of the reported LAs associated with COVID-19 are likely to be false positives, and the relationship between the detected aPL/LA and COVID-19-associated coagulopathy remains to be resolved using larger and better studies.

Failure of Anticoagulation to Prevent Stroke in Context of Lupus-Associated Anti-Phospholipid Syndrome and Mild COVID-19.

Hypercoagulability and virally-mediated vascular inflammation have become well-recognized features of the SARS-CoV-2 virus infection, COVID-19. Of growing concern is the apparent ineffectiveness of therapeutic anticoagulation in preventing thromboembolic events among some at-risk patient subtypes with COVID-19. We present a 43-year-old female with a history of seropositive-antiphospholipid syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus who developed an acute ischemic stroke in the setting of mild COVID-19 infection despite adherence to chronic systemic anticoagulation. The clinical significance of SARS-CoV-2-mediated endothelial cell dysfunction and its potential to cause macrovascular events in spite of full anticoagulation warrants further investigation and likely represents another disease-defining pathology of COVID-19.

Acquired factor V inhibitor in the setting of coronavirus disease 2019 infection.

Factor V inhibitors are a rare cause of life-threatening bleeding. We present a case of an acquired factor V inhibitor likely caused by coronavirus disease 2019 infection. Bleeding was manifested by severe anemia requiring frequent red-cell transfusion, left psoas muscle hematoma, and left retroperitoneal cavity hematoma. Factor V activity was less than 1% and the factor V inhibitor titer was 31.6 Bethesda units. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 RNA testing of the nasopharynx was positive 2 weeks before presentation and continued to be positive for 30 days. The patient failed treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin and dexamethasone. Three cycles of plasmapheresis with fresh frozen plasma replacement resulted in correction of the bleeding and laboratory coagulopathy. This is the first reported case of a factor V inhibitor in a coronavirus disease 2019 patient and suggests that plasmapheresis may be a successful treatment strategy.